| back |
I make sea pictures, but I don't mean that they're
necessarily pictures of the sea; they are pictures in the sea. This is
important because I want the sea to have more than an influence on the
work and pictures, more than just the content of the images. I want the
sea to be the one that makes the pictures and that I only make the vessels
that enable the sea to make pictures. In this way, I hope to give the
sea eyes.
Dood's idea seems to give my pinhole vessels reason and
integrity, almost an objective. And I do like to imagine that the sea
sees. The process of making cameras watertight, or at least
vaguely seaworthy, I find very enjoyable and rewarding. It's my speciality.
There are no criteria or any people to judge the effectiveness of my cameras
because there is no perfect image: the process is an experiment and any
mark is like receiving a transmission from space, in a foreign language.
It's so dependent on so many variables such as the sun, wind, waves, tide
and currents. The pinhole vessels took a long time to test and develop.
The first time I took them into the water, I also took a waterproof viewfinder
camera. These conventional images became a body of work, which developed
in parallel to the pinhole project and became a vital component. These
are my large colour images from negatives made at sea. They are pictures
in the sea. The conditions that can be seen in the images are recounted
in my language. I travelled throughout 2004, 2005 and 2006 to find a collection
of diverse conditions and remove them from their places. The seas are only seas, and provide few clues about their
whereabouts and their situation, and really could be anywhere. For this
reason I used my diary entries to provoke personal memories and bring
geographical information and history to the images. My intention is for visitors to appreciate the beauty
of the colour images, and in this, find the titles, locations and dates
to give proportion and place to otherwise obscure and slightly alien images.
The titles and corresponding log entries provide solid facts to which
one can relate. I mentioned that the process of making the cameras is
important, as is the floating of the cameras. Different cameras create
different kinds of images. For example, the first pinholes were based
on the idea of the lobster pot marker buoy. The camera was attached to
the top of the buoy, where the flag would go, kept up but the counterweight
underneath the surface. In this way the camera was a buoy and was anchored
to the seabed. It made an image marked by the brightness of the sun but
designed by the surface of the sea. In July 2005 I started to refurbish and transform a derelict
family heirloom, a mirror dinghy called GFTFD into a pinhole camera. This
September I put my Granddad's boat/pinhole camera into the water and it
made an image. It is my intention to develop this idea in Denmark with
new vessels and new images. It should be apparent that my work exists largely in the process and construction of the apparatus, working with re-appropriated materials to create primitive devices. These are strong aspects of the work and should be viewed as such. Often, the image made inside the vessel is incidental to the making and floating of the vessel itself. |